And their eyes met. Daniel meets Kafka for the first time
Synopsis from Wikipedia -

.jpg)
The film stars Hong Kong Chinese actor and former model Byron Pang (Cantonese: Pang Koon-Kei), who was a runner-up contestant for Mr. Hong Kong in 2005, and Thomas Price, a half Chinese-half British actor who appeared in Permanent Residence and City Without Baseball. Like Scud's previous films, Permanent Residence (made in 2009) and the earlier City Without Baseball (2008), Amphetamine features full-frontal male nudity in many scenes, in among others, an outdoor fight scene in which Pang is stripped naked by other boys, gym showers, and a leap from a public building, in which Pang wears 'wings', and his whole body is covered in calligraphy and silver paint.
Amphetamine examines the limit of passion, and is the second of a trilogy: the first, called Permanent Residence, examines the limit of life, while the third, known as Life of an Artist, examines the limits of art. Amphetamine was screened at the Berlin International Film Festival on 15 February 2010, and was also shown at the Hong Kong International Film Festival on its final day (6 April 2010). The third film has not yet been released.'
.jpg)
The film delivering a compelling if somewhat uneven journey through one man's personal pain. Kafka, who by fate catches Daniel's attention when the two met at a coffeeshop. Daniel is immediately attracted to Kafka and shows it, while Kafka holds back. That's because Kafka is straight - perhaps.

But Daniel sways him, first through his ardent desire and then through understanding and care. Kafka needs more than attention, he needs love and hope, and that's because he's a drug addict, a manic-depressive, and a survivor of some awful horrors. Unfortunately, he may be too much of a mess for Daniel to fully save, and even Daniel is fully aware that if Kafka is to be helped, Kafka will have to do it himself.
But it drags on waaaaay too much and is a too abstract in some places. The edits and flashbacks are confusing. The director needs to be more disciple.
My other complaint is probably the 2 leads. Their acting is a bit stilted at times especially their intimate scenes.Whether these actors are gay or not is beside the point; what they are unable to do is act like a couple in love. It is one thing to portray an awkward relationship, it is another thing to watch two men touching each other with such obvious restraint.
To be frank, you could see the potential that this film has if it was handled properly. The film possess a loaded script but only some of the potential was showing, the rest got lost in transit.
Pick up amphetamine below
No comments:
Post a Comment